Whether individual cast and plastic parts or entire assemblies, potential dimensional deviations and part warpage can lead to inefficient approval processes, as well as disruptions and complaints in manufacturing.
Using nominal-actual comparison, deviations from the CAD model can be immediately identified, and important conclusions and instructions for further component optimization can be derived.


Significant time and cost savings make nominal-actual comparison the most economical measurement method for the re-qualification of components and assemblies.
Using computer tomography or 3D scanning, meaningful data is digitized and captured in just a few minutes. The subsequent evaluation of product quality and a clear false-color representation enable precise identification and calculation of deviations. Discrepancies are clearly visible to employees.
Furthermore, comparing different alignments of nominal and actual data sets provides valuable insights for component correction and optimal alignment in the manufacturing process, without prior measurement and programming.



